Assessee can seek cross-examination of witnesses whose statements have been relied on to confirm charge of evasion against him; and any denial thereto may amount to violation of principles of natural justice and entire adjudication proceedings would be liable to be set aside : Gujarat HC

Assessee can seek cross-examination of witnesses whose statements have been relied on to confirm charge of evasion against him; and any denial thereto may amount to violation of principles of natural justice and entire adjudication proceedings would be liable to be set aside : Gujarat HC  Gujarat Cypromet Ltd

Read More

CBDT issues strict instructions to Higher Officers to deal efficiently and speedily the online rectification applications u/s 154

The CBDT has issued strict guidelines to its Higher officers that they deal speedily and efficiently the rectification applications u/s 154. This appears to have been done to comply with directions of Hon’ble Delhi HC. To view instructions Online Rectification disposal system – Sec 154 Processing of brought forward ITRs Processing of unserved Intimations 143(1)

Read More

Delhi HC grants approval u/s 10(23C) to ICAI

Exemption u/s 10(23C)(iv) allowed to Institute of Chartered Accountants of India in absence of profit motive in its activities; Existence of ‘profit motive’ would be a vital indicator in determining whether an organisation is carrying on business or not; ICAI’s activities of conducting coaching and campus placements integral to main activity of promoting accountancy courses;…

Read More

Upholds AO’s inherent power to suo-moto rectify mistakes in assessment orders. But strikes down rectification order u/s 154 which in fact was a reassessment order.

Upholds AO’s inherent power to suo-moto rectify mistakes in assessment orders; Interprets Section 21 of the General Clauses Act; However, strikes down rectification order u/s 154 which in fact was a reassessment order; Confirms ITAT ruling : Uttarakhand HC in Karjat Trade Place Pvt. Ltd. karjat trade place

Read More

Notices of demand under section 156 cannot reduce normal period of recovery from 30 days on apprehension that assessee would be exploring legal options to delay and obstruct recovery and put in tax avoidance scheme

Section 156, read with section 220, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – Notice of Demand [Time limit] – Assessment years 2007-08 to 2012-13 – Petitioner-assessee received notices of demand under section 156 – Revenue reduced time for payment from normal period of 30 days to a period of 5 days in some notices on apprehension…

Read More