Judgement: I. C. D. S. Ltd vs CIT (Supreme Court)

):- S. 32 requires that the asset must be “owned, wholly or partly, by the assessee and used for the purposes of the business”. The Department’s argument that the assessee is not the “owner” of the vehicles is not acceptable because thelease agreement specifically provided that the assessee was the exclusive owner of the vehicle…

Read More

Judgements: Satya Nand Munjal vs CGT (Supreme Court)

The fundamental question is whether there was in fact a gift of 14,000 bonus shares made by the assessee to the transferee. The answer to this question lies in s. 4(1)(c) of the Gift-tax Act which provides that “where there is a release, discharge, surrender, forfeiture or abandonment of any debt, contract or other actionable…

Read More